Contractor Bid Review

Why Are Contractor Bids So Different?

Two contractors can walk the same project, receive the same drawings, and return prices that are thousands of dollars apart. The reason is usually inside the scope.

Richard Golding

Founder, CostCheckGPT
20+ years in construction and renovation
NYC Build Remodel · DCWP HIC #2135146
California Construction & Remodeling Experts · CSLB B #1130438

Richard Golding founded CostCheckGPT after more than 20 years working in construction and renovation. He operates licensed construction businesses in New York City and California and developed CostCheckGPT around the way contractor bids are reviewed for math, scope, allowances, exclusions, and project risk.

If three contractors price the same renovation, you might expect three versions of roughly the same number.

That is rarely what happens.

One contractor may include demolition, disposal, permits, protection, painting, and final cleanup.

Another may include demolition and construction work while leaving permits, painting, and finish materials to the owner.

A third may carry several of those items as allowances.

All three can describe their proposals as a price for the same renovation.

They are still pricing different versions of the project.

That is the first thing I look for when contractor bids are far apart.

1. The scopes are different

The biggest reason contractor bids differ is that the contractors are not actually pricing the same scope.

Read each proposal line by line.

Look for work that appears in one bid and disappears in another.

Common examples include:

A $90,000 bid with a complete scope can represent less financial exposure than a $78,000 bid that leaves $20,000 of necessary work outside the contract.

The stated total is the beginning of the comparison.

2. The allowances are different

Illustrative example

An allowance is a placeholder.

It is money carried in the bid for something that has not been fully selected or priced.

Tile is a common example.

Contractor A may carry an $8,000 tile-material allowance.

Contractor B may carry $3,500.

That creates a $4,500 difference before labor, waste, pattern, trim, waterproofing, or installation conditions are considered.

If the owner eventually chooses $8,000 worth of tile, Contractor B's lower allowance did not make the project cheaper.

It delayed part of the price.

The same issue appears with:

When bids are far apart, compare the allowances before comparing the totals.

3. Contractors make different assumptions

Every estimate contains assumptions.

Some are written down.

Some are not.

A contractor may assume the existing electrical service can support the renovation.

Another may include an electrical upgrade.

A contractor may assume the subfloor is usable.

Another may carry an allowance for repair.

A contractor may assume the owner is providing fixtures.

Another may include them.

Those assumptions have dollar values.

A useful bid should make the important ones visible.

4. Labor plans are different

Contractors also build projects differently.

One may use more supervision.

One may schedule more trades at the same time.

One may self-perform parts of the work.

Another may subcontract nearly every trade.

One may price aggressive production.

Another may price a longer schedule with more protection and coordination.

Those choices affect cost.

The question for the owner is whether the bid explains enough of the plan to understand what is being purchased.

5. Material specifications are different

“Install flooring” is not a complete specification.

Neither is:

The material grade matters.

The installation method matters.

The quantity matters.

The details matter.

Two contractors can both include “tile” while carrying completely different products, labor assumptions, trim details, and installation systems.

A price comparison becomes stronger when the material assumptions are written down.

6. Exclusions are different

Read the exclusions carefully.

This is where a low bid can change quickly.

A contractor may exclude:

An exclusion does not automatically make a bid bad.

It tells you that part of the project is not inside the stated price.

That cost still needs a home somewhere.

7. Overhead and profit are different

Contractors have different businesses.

Insurance costs differ.

Supervision structures differ.

Office costs differ.

Warranty exposure differs.

Project-management systems differ.

Subcontractor relationships differ.

Profit requirements differ.

Those costs influence the selling price.

A contractor's overhead and profit should be evaluated in the context of the full proposal and the value being provided.

Example: three bids for the same renovation

The table below is illustrative.

It is designed to show what happens when stated prices are compared with scope.

ItemContractor AContractor BContractor C
Stated bid$94,500$105,000$82,000
DemolitionIncludedIncludedExcluded
PermitsIncludedIncludedExcluded
Tile allowance$8,000$9,000$3,500
PaintingIncludedIncludedExcluded
CleanupIncludedIncludedUnclear
Normalized exposure$94,500$105,000$96,000 to $104,000

Contractor C begins $12,500 below Contractor A.

Once the comparison accounts for missing work and allowance differences, the gap changes.

That does not make Contractor C the wrong contractor.

It means the owner finally has a useful comparison.

What should I ask when bids are far apart?

Start with these questions:

What work is included in one bid and missing from another?

Which items are allowances?

Which materials or fixtures am I expected to buy?

Who is responsible for permits?

Is demolition included?

Is debris removal included?

Is painting included?

Are trade permits and inspections included?

Are there electrical, plumbing, or HVAC assumptions?

Does each bid include cleanup?

Do the line items add up to the stated total?

Which exclusions will still cost money later?

Put those answers into one comparison sheet.

The numbers become easier to understand.

What is scope normalization?

CostCheckGPT calls this process scope normalization.

Scope normalization organizes multiple contractor bids around one common project scope.

The original bid totals stay visible.

The comparison layer identifies differences in:

This gives the owner a better view of what each contractor is actually offering.

Should I choose the middle bid?

There is no rule that the middle bid is the correct bid.

There is no rule that the highest bid is overpriced.

There is no rule that the lowest bid is the best value.

Understand the scope first.

Then evaluate the contractor, schedule, materials, payment structure, communication, qualifications, and price.

The takeaway

When contractor bids are far apart, start with the scope.

Find the inclusions.

Find the exclusions.

Find the allowances.

Find the assumptions.

Reconcile the math.

Then compare the prices.

That is how a stack of different contractor proposals becomes a useful decision.

Put the comparison into practice

scope normalization · contractor bid review · is this contractor quote fair · compare contractor bids

Understand the contractor bid before you sign

CostCheckGPT is being built to help homeowners and investors understand contractor bids before signing.

CostCheckGPT is currently in development. Join early access to be notified when contractor bid review opens.

Join Early Access Get the Free Guide

Published:

Last updated: